Subtotal: $
Checkout
Early Christianity recognized in all sharpness that religiosity is hostile to God. The message that Christ’s first witnesses brought was of the “transvaluation of all values,” God’s kingdom to come. They testified to a totally different order, calling it the message wrapped in mystery, concealed from those who are lost because they have been blinded by the god of this world.
The god of this world epoch, the interim god, stands opposed to the God who will set up the kingdom of Jesus Christ: justice, unity, and love. The former is the spirit of this world, personified by the media. This god of greed and murderous possessiveness is the spirit of the world. The first witnesses testified that we have not received the spirit of this world but the spirit that searches the depths of God, the spirit that nobody can know without being known by him.
Jesus said, “No one can serve two masters for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and look down on the other. You cannot serve God and mammon.”
“You may be a state trooper, you might be a young Turk,
You may be the head of some big TV network,
You may be rich or poor, you may be blind or lame,
You may be living in another country under another name
You may be a preacher with your spiritual pride,
You may be a city councilman taking bribes on the side,
You may be in a barbershop, you may know how to cut hair,
You may be somebody’s mistress, may be somebody’s heir
But you’re gonna have to serve somebody, yes indeed
You’re gonna have to serve somebody,
Well, it may be the devil or it may be the Lord
But you’re gonna have to serve somebody.”
-Bob Dylan, from “Gotta Serve Somebody”
God and mammon – from mamona, the Aramaic word for wealth – are the two masters between whom one must choose, the two goals of living that cannot be reconciled. Already at the time of the early Christians, some scholars interpreted “Mammon” as a name of the devil Beelzebub. Others interpreted it as the name of a demon particularly connected with money in Satan’s realm. Any attempt to combine service to God and service to mammon will end in failure. With one heart we must love God alone and cleave to him, despising mammon.
The materialist philosophy only makes demands for itself – comfort, bodily ease, satisfaction, and pleasure. Anyone who values the easy life values material goods and is dominated by their power. He has been made a slave because he only wants to take; he has been deprived of that wealth of life in which one wants to give and bestow. The attitude, “What can I get out of life? What’s in it for me?” serves mammon and knows only rights, though no responsibilities. Its uppermost goal is payment and gain.
It is simply a fact that most people, rich as well as poor, strive to secure property for their own benefit and comfort, often to the suppression of everything else. And many are literally carried away by their love of sensual happiness, comfort, and material things. For believers, love of money is the old (yet ever new) arch-enemy the omnipresent danger that threatened even the first Christians in the original church community.
Nothing but the overcoming of self can rid anyone of the debasement of a life lived in service of mammon. Even nonbelievers have recognized this. To quote the ancient Persian prophet Zoroaster, “Consume yourself in your own flame. How else can you become new, unless you first turn to ashes!” And then there is Goethe, who says in Faust, “So long as thou hast not / This ‘die and live again’ / A gloomy guest thou art / Here on this dark earth.”
How is it possible to “re-become,” as the mystic Eckhart put it; and how can one “de-self oneself” (Goethe) when one is bound and fettered as a slave of mammon? The answer is simple: Jesus. He alone can overcome, disarm, and bind the Enemy. His cross triumphs over every edifice of mammon constructed, maintained, and defended by the devil. The victory of the cross means deliverance from the sin of serving mammon, from the deadness of a debased life. He died for all, so that the living might no longer live for themselves but for him who died for them and was raised.
If we die with Christ, we shall live with him. Therefore set your hearts on what is above, and not on earthly things. For once you have died to mammon, you will become truly alive in God.
This article is an excerpt from Salt and Light.
You have ${x} free ${w} remaining.
This is your last free article this month.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
This article is reserved for subscribers.
Already a subscriber? Sign in
Try 3 months of unlimited access. Start your FREE TRIAL today. Cancel anytime.
Evon Da Gama - Reddy from India
Matter and motion are not substances or things as much as they are the phenomena of perceivers, the reality of which is situated in the harmony of the perceivers with themselves (at different times) and with other perceivers. I do not debate factual blessing is in sharing and giving. It isnt the ones who die with the most toys who win. Its those whove loved their families well and know the joy of having that love returned. Were relational beings created first to be in relationship with God. When sin, rebellion, or lack of attention causes a rift in this most important relationship, the resulting emptiness of soul can be very painful. When words fail us, God has provided this supernatural way by which we can let our spirits soar into His presence without the limitation of the human intellect.
Larry Leidecker from Pennsylvania
I believe you have nailed it. Our misery, and all worldly attempts to get rid of it...are the same. The focus has been on the temporary and the corrupted. Thanks for both a disturbing and reassuring eye-opener.
Melinda Hall from New Jersey
I love Bob Dylan! So of course I read this article with enormous enthusiasm. Sadly, its entirely true. My mother adores me and freely donates her money and time and resources to our church and she has always found truth in that song. Thank you!
Phil Mawhinney from United Kingdom
Thank you for this article. I think this article is very challenging and its bluntness towards the attitudes of today's institutionalised church and the culture of comfort and wealth in the church are very welcome. However, part of me feels that the idea of being a 'slave to wealth' is a fairly ambiguous term. We all need money and a strong argument could be put forward for the need and responsibility of providing for your family into the future. That is why I try and take articles like this as a personal challenge - I find it impossible to criticise others in this area due to wealth being in a sense a continuum. I dont feel this article does unfairly judge but this is an area where there may be the potential for christians to judge others christians without knowing their situation.