Subtotal: $
Checkout-
Editors’ Picks: Issue 26
-
Little Women, Rebel Angels
-
Sojourner Truth
-
Covering the Cover: What Are Families For?
-
Another View: Sunday Supper
-
Proteus Unbound
-
The First Society
-
The Corporate Parent
-
Family Matters
-
Letters from Readers
-
Family and Friends: Issue 26
-
The Case for One More Child
-
The Best of Times, the Worst of Times
-
Return to Vienna
-
You Can’t Go Home Again
-
Two Poems
-
Why Inheritance Matters
-
Not Just Nuclear
-
Dependence
-
The Praying Feminist
-
Letters from Death Row
-
The Beautiful Institution
-
Putting Marriage Second
-
Singles in the Pew
-
New Prince, New Pompe
The old trinity was of father and mother and child and is called the human family. The new is of child and mother and father and has the name of the Holy Family. It is in no way altered except in being entirely reversed; just as the world which is transformed was not in the least different, except in being turned upside down.
This sketch of the human story began in a cave; the cave which popular science associates with the caveman and in which practical discovery has really found archaic drawings of animals. The second half of human history, which was like a new creation of the world, also begins in a cave. There is even a shadow of such a fancy in the fact that animals were again present; for it was a cave used as a stable by the mountaineers of the uplands about Bethlehem; who still drive their cattle into such holes and caverns at night. It was here that a homeless couple had crept underground with the cattle when the doors of the crowded caravanserai had been shut in their faces; and it was here beneath the very feet of the passers-by, in a cellar under the very floor of the world, that Jesus Christ was born. But in that second creation there was indeed something symbolical in the roots of the primeval rock or the horns of the prehistoric herd. God also was a caveman, and had also traced strange shapes of creatures, curiously colored, upon the wall of the world; but the pictures that he made had come to life.
A mass of legend and literature, which increases and will never end, has repeated and rung the changes on that single paradox; that the hands that had made the sun and stars were too small to reach the huge heads of the cattle.
Any agnostic or atheist whose childhood has known a real Christmas has ever afterwards, whether he likes it or not, an association in his mind between two ideas that most of mankind must regard as remote from each other; the idea of a baby and the idea of unknown strength that sustains the stars. His instincts and imagination can still connect them, when his reason can no longer see the need of the connection; for him there will always be some savor of religion about the mere picture of a mother and a baby; some hint of mercy and softening about the mere mention of the dreadful name of God.… There is really a difference between the man who knows it and the man who does not.
It might be suggested, in a somewhat violent image, that nothing had happened in that fold or crack in the great grey hills except that the whole universe had been turned inside out. I mean that all the eyes of wonder and worship which had been turned outwards to the largest thing were now turned inward to the smallest.
Whether as a myth or a mystery, Christ was obviously conceived as born in a hole in the rocks primarily because it marked the position of one outcast and homeless. Nevertheless it is true, as I have said, that the cave has not been so commonly or so clearly used as a symbol as the other realities that surrounded the first Christmas.
And the reason for this also refers to the very nature of that new world. It was in a sense the difficulty of a new dimension. Christ was not only born on the level of the world, but even lower than the world. The first act of the divine drama was enacted, not only on no stage set up above the sight-seer, but on a dark and curtained stage sunken out of sight; and that is an idea very difficult to express in most modes of artistic expression.
But in the riddle of Bethlehem it was heaven that was under the earth. There is in that alone the touch of a revolution, as of the world turned upside down.
Abridged excerpt from The Everlasting Man (Hodder & Stoughton, 1925), 201–207.
Already a subscriber? Sign in
Try 3 months of unlimited access. Start your FREE TRIAL today. Cancel anytime.
Dr Russell Ken Carter
I love the concept of the cave; mankind was born in a cave; Jesus (Truth & Love) therefore was also born in a cave and was brought to light by God.
George Marsh
Chesterton was fond of paradox, apparent contradiction. The most wonderful of which is the Incarnation of the Infinitely Powerful One as a most vulnerable and ignorant Infant. As time has evolved, the tiniest observable bits of matter become recognized by scientists as mighty mysteries of power and motion; and what once was considered a cycle of life with no apparent significance or value is more recently seen as a positive evolution toward a great summation and fulfillment--the Omega envisioned by John the Evangelist and the paleontologist Teilhard de Chardin and his exponents.
Jerry Thompson
Thought-provoking beyond the imagination.
Larry
It seems that each age has had a problem of identifying the housing arrangements of Mary, Joseph and Yeshua (Jesus). Why is it so hard to identify the event with Succoth and they were in an outside built for succoth house and they tabernacled in it on the Feast of Tabernacles, a Feast of YeHoVah (God)?